Are ALL types of genital piercings considered “genital mutilation”?

There are different types of genital piercings. There are the kind that pierce directly through the organ itself, like the head of the penis for example... and then there are the types that pierce only the skin surrounding the organ, like the frenum piercing that pierces only the skin located under the head of the penis. Would having just a "frenum" piercing still be considered as "genital mutilation", even if no cutting or damage is being done to the actual organ itself, but only the surrounding skin?

Similar Piercing Answers:

  • Would getting a “frenum piercing” be considered as a masochistic practice? ...There are some genital piercings that are extreme and can be viewed as mutilating to the penis itself… like the “Prince Albert” piercing which pierces directly through the penis itself. But then there are other genital piercings, like the frenum piercing, which only pierces through the surround skin, usually on the underside of the...

  • If some people consider genital piercings as “genital mutilation”… then…? ...If some people consider genital piercings as “genital mutilation”… then should having your ears pierced also be consider a type of mutilation? If not… shouldn’t genital piercings, at least the ones that do not pierce the organ itself but only the surrounding skin, also not be considered “mutilation”? ...

  • Is getting or having a genital piercing (not the kind that pierces through the organ itself, but the kind that ...Many couples choose to get genital piercings to enhance sexual intercourse… and do this as a private matter between marriage partners. Is getting or having a genital piercing (not the kind that pierces through the organ itself, but the kind that pierces only the surrounding loose skin)… perverted, immoral, or wrong in some way?...

  • Are piercings such as nipple and frenum piercings considered extreme piercings? ...When I first heard of genital piercings, I used to consider that extreme piercings. But afterwards I found out that piercings such as a frenum piercing, is nothing more than a piercing through the loose skin under the head of the penis. This is the same loose skin that is cut during circumcision....

  • Would this type of body piercing be morally wrong? ...People usually kringe at the thought of having their genitals pierced. However the “frenum piercing” is nothing more than a piercing on the loose skin on the underside of the head of the penis. This is the same loose skin that is cut during circumcision, it’s just skin that’s pierced not the actual...

5 Comments: Trackback URL | Comments RSS

  1. Andrew Says:

    They are considered mutilation by me.

  2. World Peace Now Says:

    No it would be considered just plain stupid and not necessary!

  3. LMT07 Says:

    To each his own..if you want it done go do it!

  4. omorris1978 Says:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_genital_mutilation

    this may help answer your question

  5. michael Says:

    technically all piercings are mutillation

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Looking:

  • piercing extreme sur p?nis
  • extrem.piercing
  • penile mutilation prince albert
  • www.genital.extremepiercing.de
  • penises pierced and mutilated
  • percing extreme sur p?nis
  • pierced extream genital organ
  • piercing genital extr?me
  • penis.piercing.extreme
  • extreme penis piercings
  • Genital ekstreme piercing
  • extrem piercing genital
  • all types of penis piercing
  • under skin cock piercings
  • extreem cock piercings
  • extr?me piercing g?nitaux
  • what is considered a genital
  • different types of piercing for penis
  • mutilation of the penis
  • piering genital extreme